USPTO serial 76276283
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plano, TX
San Ramon, CA
San Ramon, CA
SAN RAMON, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
Gregory N. Owen Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C.455 Market Street, Suite 1910San Francisco, CA 94105-2420UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF CELLULAR MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES; LOCATION AND EQUIPMENT REGISTERS; PACKET DATA SWITCHING AND GATEWAYS; RADIO BASE STATIONS; RADIO TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVERS, TRANSCEIVERS, REPEATERS; ANTENNAS; WIRELESS CUSTOMER TERMINAL SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING WIRELESS SERVICES IN MOBILE TELEPHONES[, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS (PDAS),] AND PORTABLE COMPUTERS; TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, [MICROWAVE RADIO TRANSMITTERS], RECEIVERS, TRANSCEIVERS, REPEATERS/REGENERATORS; [ANTENNAS; ]COMPRESSORS, MULTIPLEXERS; GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, TELEPHONY, VOICE, DATA AND COMPUTER NETWORKING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ROUTERS, GATEWAYS, BRIDGES, [HUBS], NODES, SERVERS, FIREWALLS; GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TERMINALS AND APPLIANCES FOR INTERCONNECTING AND INTERFACING WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC HANDLING AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR CACHING, COMPRESSION, MULTIPLEXING, PROTOCOL CONVERSION, LOAD BALANCING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMER SERVICE AND TRANSFERRING CALL RECORDS AND BILLING INFORMATION; NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR TRACKING ALL NETWORK TRANSACTIONS AND SENDING NETWORK ALARMS; TEST EQUIPMENT AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING, MEASURING AND OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS; SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
| 035 | RETAIL AND WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA NETWORKING EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND CLASSES FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA NETWORKING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 9, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |