USPTO serial 76276325
WE DELIVER! PUDGIE'S FAMOUS CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2741056Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE DELIVER! PUDGIE'S FAMOUS CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAKE SUCCESS, NY
LAKE SUCCESS, NY
Lake Success, NY
Lake Success, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARREN B. COHEN
DARREN B COHEN ESQ REED SMITH LLC599 LEXINGTON AVE 29TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-7650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | FRANCHISING, NAMELY, OFFERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF RESTAURANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PAT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PAT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PUDGIE'S FAMOUS CHICKEN, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PUDGIE'S FAMOUS CHICKEN, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WE DELIVER! PUDGIE'S FAMOUS CHICKEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |