USPTO serial 76276556
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. DuPre
JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON BROOK SMITH & REYNOLDS PCP O BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications devices, namely telephones and telephone accessories, namely, headsets, earphones, telephone speakers, telephone microphones, and data transfer devices and controllers, namely, electronic circuit boards that facilitate and control the transfer of data information; Internet devices, namely, electronic circuits that support a logical connection including a wireless link between a user and the Internet; computers, radios, headphones; wireless communication devices, namely,pagers, personal digital assistants and mobile phones; telematic devices, namely, audio speakers, audio microphones, and wireless headsets and wireless electronic equipment, namely, electronic circuits that support a logical connection including a wireless link, all designed for use in automobiles, buses, planes, trains and other transportation vehicles; Internet appliance, namely, electronic circuit boards that are designed to provide individual or aggregate access to the Internet; electronic devices, namely, keyboards, mice and accessories that communicate with computers, namely, electronic circuit boards and microchips, joysticks, headsets, microphones, video cameras, digital cameras, printers, portable computers, personal digital assistants, scanners and data storage devices, namely, computer memory chips, computer disk drives, computer memory, blank computer disks and electronic circuit boards that interface with memory to store and retrieve data information; electronic circuit boards coupled to transducers that maintain a wireless communication link regardless of orientation; electronic circuitry that modulates a digital or analog signal onto a carrier frequency to transmit and receive information; transceivers, and electronic circuits boards that transmit and receive via an electromagnetic field; display devices, namely, liquid crystal displays, light emitting diode displays, video displays, flat-panel displays, CRT-based displays; electronic identification tags, wireless credit cards, and remote door openers; security systems, namely, electronic circuits that communicate information for controlling or monitoring the access to physical or electronic locations; remote controllers, namely, electronic circuits boards that wirelessly communicate command and control information; audio headsets, MP3/music players, stereo headsets and game controllers; and electronic circuits, namely, integrated circuits, microchips, semiconductors, semiconductor chips, and semiconductor devices for transmission of voice, data or audio information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |