USPTO serial 76276572
BB.SNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BB.SNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON CORRIGAN
JASON CORRIGAN C/O ESTEE LAUDER INC767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153-0003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations; namely, hair shampoos; hair conditioners; hair elixirs; hair pomade; styling creams, lotions and gels; hair spray; hair gloss; hair tonic; anti-frizzing preparations; brilliantine; styling wax; setting lotions and gels; thickening sprays and lotions; fragrances for the hair, namely, perfumes; skin care and body products, namely, moisturizers, oils, creams, lotions and cleansers; cosmetics, toiletries and fragrances, namely perfumes, colognes and bath oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |