USPTO serial 76276650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
Shaker Heights, OH
Other trademarks owned by Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
Shaker Heights, OH
Other trademarks owned by Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
Shaker Heights, OH
Other trademarks owned by Hummer Whole Health Management, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Koenig
Sandra M. Koenig FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION VIA AN INTERNET WEB SITE WHICH PROVIDES CLINICIANS USE OF AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD, CONTENT AND RESEARCH AND PRACTICE MANAGEMENT FOR CARE OF PATIENTS; PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION VIA AN INTERNET WEB SITE WHICH PROVIDES PATIENTS WITH PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION AND CONTENT RESEARCH; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE THAT ENABLES EMPLOYERS THE ABILITY TO ANALYZE HEALTH DATA RELATED TO THEIR EMPLOYEES IN ORDER TO EVALUATE THE AFFECTS OF EMPLOYEE HEALTH ON PRODUCTIVITY AND TO UNDERSTAND WHERE HEALTH COSTS ARE CONCENTRATED WITHIN THE EMPLOYERS' BUSINESS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |