USPTO serial 76276913
MERCURY MICROSYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3178849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2006
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MERCURY MICROSYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mercury Microsystems Corporation
Santa Clara, CA
Mercury Microsystems Corporation
Santa Clara, CA
Mercury Microsystems Corporation
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAULA J. KRASNY
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPHCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development for multi-lingual speech and voice recognition software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software which uses voice recognition technology and provides back-up computer programs and facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercury Microsystems Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mercury Microsystems Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Mercury Microsystems Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MERCURY MICROSYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |