USPTO serial 76276970
DIETSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIETSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER LUPO, ESQ.
EDWARD M WEISZ COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANESTE 1210551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy based food beverages; soy-based beverages used as a milk substitute; fruit based snack bars; protein bars; vegetable snacks; fruit snacks; soup broth; peanut butter; butter substitutes; cheese and cracker combinations; cheese spreads; cheese substitutes; potato chips; cooking oil; cream cheese; processed fruits; egg substitutes; frozen entrees consisting primarily of Ineal, fish, poultry or vegetables; luncheon meats; cooking oil; package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and processed fruit; fruit based fillings for cakes and pies; protein for use as a food additive; packaged garden salads; fruit sauces; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and raisins; soups; soup mixes; preserved truffles; yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |