Drawing for THE CERTIFIABLE

USPTO serial 76277038

THE CERTIFIABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE CERTIFIABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Shaw

BRIAN B SHAW HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the fields of business, personal and professional management and developmentACTIVEOct 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 28, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance