USPTO serial 76277040
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-74167 Neckarsulm, DE
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan P. Osha
Johathan P. Osha Osha Liang LLP1221 McKinney Street Suite 2800Houston, TX 77010UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic jellies, jams, fruit spreads, preserved fruit, canned fruit and fruit preserves, all being for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Jellies, jams, fruit spreads, preserved fruit, canned fruit and fruit preserves; dietetic jellies, jams, fruit spreads, preserved fruit, canned fruit and fruit preserves, none being of medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |