USPTO serial 76277275
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SIMILARITY VECTOR TECHNOLOGIES (SIVTECH) LIMITED
DUBLIN 2, IE
Other trademarks owned by SIMILARITY VECTOR TECHNOLOGIES (SIVTECH) LIMITED
SIMILARITY VECTOR TECHNOLOGIES (SIVTECH) LIMITED
DUBLIN 2, IE
Other trademarks owned by SIMILARITY VECTOR TECHNOLOGIES (SIVTECH) LIMITED
East Hanover, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERS4 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 33SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4106UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consulting services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems via telephone, e-mail, Internet and in person | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |