USPTO serial 76277378
G GEMINI BROADBAND VOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G GEMINI BROADBAND VOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan J. Kohlmann
SUSAN J KOHLMANN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1 BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Hardware, devices and equipment, namely network interface devices and customer premise equipment that operate via broadband networks to provide voice over IP services; software for providing voice over IP services which enable users to make domestic and international calls from standard analog phones utilizing a high speed Internet connection and calling features, namely caller ID, voice mail, call forwarding, call waiting, second line number, call return and distinctive ring | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
| 035 | Providing telephony billing services for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services,namely, voice over the Internet Protocol, voice over IP services via broadband networks and a global communications network which enable users to make domestic and international calls from standard analog phones utilizing a high speed Internet connection, provide calling features, namely call identification, voice mail, call forwarding, call waiting, second line number, call return and distinctive ring | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2001 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software and hardware in the field of providing voice over Internet Protocol, voice over Internet Protocol services which enable users to make domestic and international calls from standard analog phones utilizing a high speed Internet connection and in the field of providing calling features, namely caller identification, voice mail, call forwarding, call waiting, second line number, call return and distinctive ring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gemini Voice Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named G GEMINI BROADBAND VOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |