USPTO serial 76277458
ECOFRESH INSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOFRESH INSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delhi, 110054, IN
Delhi, 110054, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Weild III
ILENE B TANNEN ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Energy recovery ventilators; fresh air preconditioners and energy saving preconditioners which recover energy exhausted out from conditioned air spaces and uses the recovered energy to precondition, i;e; heat or cool, fresh air being brought into conditioned spaces such as classrooms, homes, offices, conference rooms, restaurants, pubs, etc; treated fresh air units, also known as fresh air units, which are packages air handling units incorporating energy recovery to ensure fresh air is preconditioned prior to entering conditioned spaces and preconditions the fresh air with the energy recovered from air conditioning systems; air handling units for treating fresh air, heat recovery wheels; energy recovery rotors, also known as heat wheels, for recovering wasted energy from the air exhausted from the conditioned spaces and used to precondition the fresh air being brought into the conditioned spaces to improve/maintain/enhance quality of air in conditioned spaces such as hotels, hospitals, commercial buildings, auditoriums and all other types of conditioned spaces; and structural parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |