USPTO serial 76277513
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP FURGANG
PHILIP FURGANG FURGANG & ADWAR LLP2 CROSFIELD AVENUESUITE 210NYACK, NY 10994-2231| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |