Drawing for ROGAN

USPTO serial 76277664

ROGAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROGAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul J. Vincenti

PAUL J VINCENTI VINCENTI & VINCENTI, PC3 NEW YORK PLZ FL 14NEW YORK, NY 10004-2442UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Bracelets, rings, chains, and pendantsACTIVE—
018Leather handbags and wallets, fabric handbagsACTIVE—
025Pants, shirts, footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 11, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 7, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 1, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance