USPTO serial 76277753
CROPSOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3112274Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2006
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CROPSOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MORRISVILLE, NC
MORRISVILLE, NC
Morrisville, NC
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Freya Olive
SUSAN FREYA OLIVE OLIVE & OLIVE PAPO BOX 2049500 MEMORIAL STDURHAM, NC 27702-2049Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides, all for agricultural and domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CROPSOLUTION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CROPSOLUTION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cropsolution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cropsolution, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CROPSOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |