USPTO serial 76277781
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER SHMULEWITZ
ROBERT L SHERMAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, TOILET WATER, NON-MEDICATED GELS AND SALTS FOR THE BATH AND THE SHOWER, TOILET SOAPS, BODY DEODORANTS, COSMETICS, NAMELY CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS FOR THE FACE, THE BODY AND THE HANDS, SUN CARE LOTIONS, MAKE-UP KITS COMPRISED OF LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, MASCARA, EYE SHADOW, FOUNDATION CREAMS, NAIL ENAMELS; SHAMPOOS, GELS, SPRAYS, MOUSSES AND BALMS FOR HAIR STYLING AND HAIR CARE, HAIR COLORING AND HAIR DECOLORANT PREPARATIONS, PERMANENT HAIR WAVING AND HAIR CURLING PREPARATIONS, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, AND LIP LINERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |