USPTO serial 76277854
OPEN BUSINESS RULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN BUSINESS RULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M3C 3G8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL I. J. FLEISCHUT
PAUL I J FLEISCHUT SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDEL1 METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN WORK AND TASK SCHEDULING, MANAGEMENT, REPORTING AND ANALYSIS; FOR USE IN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; AND FOR USE IN EMPLOYEE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT, INSTALLATION, CUSTOMIZATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE ALL FOR USE IN WORK AND TASKS SCHEDULING, MANAGEMENT, REPORTING AND ANALYSIS; FOR USE IN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; AND FOR USE IN EMPLOYEE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |