Drawing for ARGENT

USPTO serial 76277893

ARGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin E. Peterka

KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER, NEMER, FIELDS & YOUNGER601 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Mortgage lending; mortgage banking; broker services, namely, mortgage brokerage; mortgage lending and financial services, namely, loan processing, loan collections for residential mortgages and not for hospitals, and mortgage brokerage not mutual fund brokerage; and wholesale and retail mortgage services, namely purchasing mortgage loans from real estate and mortgage brokers and correspondent lenders for others, brokering the sale and servicing of mortgage loans to secondary mortgage lenders, maintenance of mortgage escrow accounts, and purchasing mortgage loans from real estate and mortgage brokers and correspondent lenders over the global computer network for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance