USPTO serial 76277912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKERP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements and nutritional supplements; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing creatine and creatine monohydrate; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing calcium; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing vitamin C; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing methoxyisoflavone and ipriflavone; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing glucosamine, chondroitin and methylsulfonylemethane; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing vitamins; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing minerals; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements containing dextrose and other simple sugars; soft chews for use as dietary supplements and nutritional supplements; soft chews, namely dietary supplements and nutritional supplements for use in connection with muscle and strength building, joint enhancement, weight gain, weight loss, fat reduction, diet control and anti-aging; dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; and nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |