USPTO serial 76278166
INTERDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2804017Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN D. MCCARTHY
KEVIN D MCCARTHY ROACH BROWN MCCARTHY & GRUBER, PC1620 LIBERTY BLDGBUFFALO, NY 14202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF ENTERPRISE SECURITY TO PROTECT WEBSITES, DATABASES AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ACCESSIBLE FROM THE INTERNET BY INTERCEPTING INCOMING AND OUTGOING TRAFFIC AND VALIDATING THE COMMUNICATION; AND RACK-MOUNTABLE COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE NATURE OF SERVERS CONTAINING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF ENTERPRISE SECURITY TO PROTECT WEBSITES, DATABASES AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ACCESSIBLE FROM THE INTERNET BY INTERCEPTING INCOMING AND OUTGOING TRAFFIC AND VALIDATING THE COMMUNICATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |