Drawing for SAFETYLINK

USPTO serial 76278235

SAFETYLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFETYLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Snodgrass

JOHN C SNODGRASS DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006couplings made primarily of metal that automatically release when impacted, for utility pole guy wiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance