Drawing for CRUSH CARD

USPTO serial 76278247

CRUSH CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUSH CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Stand-alone video game machines; hand-held units for playing electronic games; board games and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; card games; dice; promotional game materials; game equipment, namely, chips; toys, namely action figures; dolls and playsets thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance