USPTO serial 76278318
AEROCHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROCHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE DOS CAMPOS, SP 12227-901, BR
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12225-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12225-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an online directory featuring suppliers of parts and equipment for aircraft; providing online ordering services for others in the field of aircraft parts and equipment; auctions of aircraft parts and equipment on the Internet; management of supply chain between suppliers and aircraft manufacturers; providing online services, namely, inventory management for planning stock of replacement parts for air companies; and promoting the goods and services of third parties by placing advertisements on a website accessed through the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and support for maintenance services accomplishment for aircraft and aircraft equipment, namely, updating records of maintenance, tracking maintenance activities and status, controlling maintenance schedules, controlling deferred/pending maintenance activities, and evaluating performance and costs of maintenance activities | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | organization technical discussion seminars by means of classes and distance learning on the web | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing on-line aircraft parts catalogues and technical manuals in the field of aircraft and aircraft equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AEROCHAIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |