Drawing for HOTSIP

USPTO serial 76278413

HOTSIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOTSIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brewster Taylor

BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON & TAYLOR1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use within the field of mobile telecommunication and Internet communication, namely, real-time communication and instant messaging software, call routing software, software for integrating and managing PBX systems, protocol software, server software and computer gateway softwareACTIVE—
038Computer aided communication of messages and images, personal communication via mobile terminals, namely, via mobile phones, personal digital assistants, laptop computers, and personal computer companions; electronic mail communication; telecommunications consultationACTIVE—
042Computer programming for others, maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software for others, consultation in the field of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance