Drawing for Serial No. 76278423

USPTO serial 76278423

Serial No. 76278423

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3684741Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 22, 2009
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with Serial No. 76278423?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D. Sanok

Jeffrey D. Sanok CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee; cocoa; tea; miso, namely, soybean paste; dressings, namely, salad dressing; seasoning sauce for Korean barbecue; cube sugar; parched sesame seeds mixed with salts, for use as a seasoning or spice; celery salts; dried peppers, dried red peppers, table salts, and red-bean paste for use as a seasoning; spices; non-essential oil flavorings, husked oats; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; processed cereal, namely, noodles; sandwiches; meat buns; hamburgers; yeast; meat tenderizers, for household purposesACTIVE—
042[ Restaurant services, featuring Korean barbecue ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2020RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 8, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 6, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2019E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2016C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 30, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2016E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 18, 2009DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Aug 18, 2009IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 18, 2009D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005ADBS1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED—
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2005PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED—
May 18, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 5, 2005PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance