USPTO serial 76278627
SPL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. J. Heher
R J HEHER ESQ FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-2008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | outsourcing services in the fields of computer hardware, computer software, and customer relationship management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer services namely, providing computer software applications in the field of commercial business applications used for the management of data to others over global computer networks; computer network management services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |