USPTO serial 76281667
PROFUMAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROFUMAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody L. Factor
JODY L FACTOR LAW OFFICE OF FACTOR AND PARTNERS LLC1327 W WASHINGTON BLVD APT 5G-HCHICAGO, IL 60607-1912UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BIOTECHNOLOGICALS, NAMELY, MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | BIOTECHNOLOGICALS, NAMELY MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL TESTING AND AS THERAPEUTIC AGENTS FOR THE TREATMENT AND/OR IDENTIFICATION OF VARIOUS DISEASES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO CANCER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENTREPRISES DE RECHERCHE, FABRICATION ET ANALYSES (ERFA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ERFA CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PROFUMAB
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |