USPTO serial 76283951
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec H4P 1T7, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Boyle
JAMES F BOYLE BOYLE FREDRICKSON NEWHOLM STEI & GRATZ250 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1030MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4256UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE PROTOTYPING SOFTWARE AND REAL-TIME SIMULATION SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS USED PRIMARILY IN THE FIELDS OF AEROSPACE, DEFENSE AND AUTOMOTIVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY CONSULTATION AND CUSTOM DESIGN OF HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE PROTOTYPING SOFTWARE AND REAL-TIME SIMULATION SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS USED PRIMARILY IN THE FIELDS OF AEROSPACE, DEFENSE AND AUTOMOTIVE; SUPPORT SERVICES NAMELY MAINTENANCE SERVICES RELATED TO HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE PROTOTYPE SOFTWARE AND REAL-TIME SIMULATION SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS USED PRIMARILY IN THE FIELDS OF AEROSPACE, DEFENSE AND AUTOMOTIVE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |