USPTO serial 76284106
LACTOGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, DAHLIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LACTOGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABOR L. SZEKERES
GABOR L SZEKERES LAW OFFICES OF GABOR L. SZEKERESSTE 1128141 E KAISER BLVDANAHEIM, CA 92808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Licensing of technology pertaining to products containing micro-encapsulated lactobacilli or related organisms | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2005 |
| 040 | Manufacturing of products containing micro-encapsulated lactobacilli or related organisms to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |