USPTO serial 76286578
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Birmingham, AL
Birmingham, AL
Birmingham, AL
HOUSTON, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
India E. Vincent
India E. Vincent BURR & FORMAN LLP420 North 20th StreetSuite 3400BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | [ Public utility services in the nature of natural gas and coalbed methane gas distribution ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1985 |
| 040 | [ Oil and gas well treatment; gas production services, namely, natural gas and coalbed methane gas production services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1985 |
| 042 | Geophysical exploration for the oil and gas industries; management and design of oil and gas well drilling; oil and gas well prospecting, namely, well logging and testing; coalbed methane resource assessment; development of coalbed methane resources | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 5, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |