USPTO serial 76286713
THE WRIGHT BROTHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3436498Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE WRIGHT BROTHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger H. Bora
Roger H. Bora Thompson Hine LLPP.O. Box 8801Dayton, OH 45401-8801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigarette lighters not of precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Wright Family Fund, c/o The Roger Richman Agency, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named THE WRIGHT BROTHERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |