Drawing for POWER TAPE

USPTO serial 76292739

POWER TAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER TAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christel Emerson

Christel Emerson Henkel of America, Inc.1001 Trout Brook CrossingLaw Department - TrademarksRocky Hill, CT 06067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Duct tape for household use sold through general merchandising channels of trade, hardware stores and home centersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 16, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance