Drawing for AIRTEXT

USPTO serial 76298586

AIRTEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRTEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Barber

PATCHEN M HAGGERTY SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT1211 SW FIFTH AVE STE 1600-1900PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely the broadcasting and delivery of text, graphic, audio, video, and multimedia content by means of radio, cellular, and wireless communication networks and other facilities for real-time interaction, and the electronic receipt and transmission of messages, text, graphics, multimedia content and other data for entertainment via radio, cellular, and wireless communication networks and other facilities for real-time interactionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 11, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 12, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance