Drawing for Serial No. 76298661

USPTO serial 76298661

Serial No. 76298661

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76298661?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH WHEELS AND TIRES IN BALANCING WHEELS AND TIRESACTIVE—
007COMPRESSED AIR PUMPS; COMPRESSED AIR MACHINES; AND COMPRESSED AIR GUNS FOR THE INJECTION OF GELS AND CHEMICAL PRODUCTSACTIVE—
009WHEEL AND TIRE BALANCING MACHINES FOR LAND VEHICLESACTIVE—
037BALANCING OF WHEELS AND TIRESACTIVE—
042LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MATERIAL TESTING; PATENT EXPLOITATION AND CONSULTATION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance