USPTO serial 76304541
Z-LIPOTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Z-LIPOTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven L. Baglio
AGNES S LEE ESQ ROPES & GRAY LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLTRADEMARK DOCKETING SPECIALISTBOSTON, MA 21102624Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultation, drug discovery, analytical and research and development services in the fields of bioinformatics, genetics, genetic engineering, computational biology, pharmaceuticals, genomics and related testing for others; identification, characterization and screening for genes and chemical compounds for others for use as drug targets, therapeutic proteins and drugs | ACTIVE | Jul 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |