USPTO serial 76305593
SECUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
NEIL F GREENBLUM AND BRUCE H BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs to control building environmental, access and security systems in the field of computer security; computer software to control building environmental, access and security systems in the field of computer security; computer utility software, namely, a software security program; computer data encryption software that protects data in computers, using an encoded mathematical algorithm to scramble data for computer security; computer hardware, namely, computer security memory cards and computer security memory chips; computer security radio frequency recognition apparatus, namely, radar; computer security integrated circuit chip recognition apparatus, namely, encoded electronic chip cards for decryption of messages; computer security fingerprint recognition apparatus, namely, encoded electronic chip cards for recognizing fingerprints; computer security fingerprint recognition apparatus, namely, laser readers of fingers for use with entry control locks; computer security fingerprint recognition apparatus, namely, time punch clocks with fingerprint recognition; computer security voice recognition apparatus, namely, encoded electronic chip cards for voice recognition; computer security voice recognition apparatus, namely, computers with integrated microphones for recognizing voices for personal computing; computer security voice recognition apparatus, namely, entryway security locks with voice recognition microphones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |