USPTO serial 76310988
QLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elisabeth A. Langworthy, David E. Weslow, Patricia B. Cunningham, John L. North, Peter G. Pappas, Daniel J. Warren, James H. Johnson, Jr.
ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio wiring electrical connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |