Drawing for FERTILITY BLEND

USPTO serial 76312705

FERTILITY BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERTILITY BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICE OF JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MC LEAN, VA 22101-5726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVEDec 27, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 22, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 24, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance