USPTO serial 76314048
GAMING CLUB CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAMING CLUB CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concord, Ontario L4K 4M2, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADMINISTRATION OF A DISCOUNT PROGRAM FOR CLUB MEMBERS IN WHICH MEMBERS RECEIVE A CARD ENABLING THEM TO OBTAIN DISCOUNTS ON TRAVEL, ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING-RELATED GOODS AND SERVICES; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN THE TRAVEL, ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING-RELATED FIELDS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF DISCOUNT CARDS TO CLUB MEMBERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |