Drawing for PARNASSOS NAPHAC

USPTO serial 76316228

PARNASSOS NAPHAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARNASSOS NAPHAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID R. STEVENS

David R. Stevens Stevens Law Group1754 Technology Drive, Suite 226San Jose, CA 95110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer; malt beer; hop extracts for making beer; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, beer and cocktail mixes; bottled waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Aug 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance