USPTO serial 76316527
CRAMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3069621Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRAMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lower Bristol Road Bath BA2 3EZ, GB
Lower Bristol Road Bath BA2 3EZ, GB
Lower Bristol Road Bath BA2 3EZ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole L. Linehan
JOSEPH V. MYERS, III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree Street, NESuite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for management enhancement and provisioning in connection with mobile and fixed telecommunications networks for use in the telecommunications industry; network management software for the telecommunications industry; network inventory management software for the telecommunications industry; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business management, namely, operation and management of telecommunications networks; business management consultation services in the fields of telecommunications, network management, network provisioning, process management, business management, return on investment, product demonstration, and cost price analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data, software, documents, and images over communications networks; providing information regarding telecommunications and electronic communications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy, design, research, development, and advisory services relating to telecommunications software and security management; testing for new product development in the field of telecommunications software and security management; computer programming; computer systems analysis; design of software for use with telecommunications systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cramer Systems Europe Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cramer Systems Europe Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Cramer Systems Europe Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CRAMER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |