USPTO serial 76317002
SPRING COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRING COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C REGEHR TECHLAW VENTURES PLLC333 S 520 W STE 220LINDON, UT 84042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communication products and accessories, namely, wireless telephones, pagers, email devices, Internet connectivity devices, hand held computers; accessories for wireless communication devices, namely, cases and holsters, chargers, adapters, ear speakers, microphones, hands free kits, docking stations, memory cards, face plates, antennas, modems, computer game software and computer search engine software both for use in wireless telephones, pagers and email devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of wireless communication services, namely, voice, data, cellular, PCS, broadband, and Internet connectivity | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation services for wireless communication products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spring Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Spring Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SPRING COMMUNICATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |