USPTO serial 76318397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
MCLEAN, VA, US
Springfield, VA, US
McLean, VA, US
Springfield, VA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software and online computer software for online, wireless and offline verification of Internet access and participation in consumer transactions, privacy, security, Internet access, parental consent, and children's safety; computer software and online computer software for use in computer and Internet access control; computer software for monitoring, managing, filtering, and controlling access to computers and computer networks; and user manuals sold with the aforementioned hardware and software as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others; Providing online directory information services also featuring hyperlinks to other web sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely online and offline registration and verification of consent for Internet access and participation in consumer transactions; providing consultation in the field of protection, verification and registration of online users and participation in consumer transactions, privacy, security, Internet access, parental consent, and children's safety; providing an online database in the field of children's use of the Internet, parental consent, registration of children's use of the Internet, online and offline verification of Internet access and participation in consumer transactions, privacy, security, Internet access, parental consent, and children's safety; promoting public awareness of the need for online and offline privacy and security | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |