USPTO serial 76321534
INVISIBLE SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVISIBLE SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Anderson
THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE ET AL280 N OLD WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-5394UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRESENCE SENSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PROXIMITY SENSORS FOR USE WITH FENCE, GATE, BARRIER OR DOOR ACCESS CONTROL AND ASSOCIATED CONTROL SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |