Drawing for INVISIBLE SHIELD

USPTO serial 76321534

INVISIBLE SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TRADEMARK ASSISTANCE CENTER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVISIBLE SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Anderson

THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE ET AL280 N OLD WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-5394UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRESENCE SENSING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PROXIMITY SENSORS FOR USE WITH FENCE, GATE, BARRIER OR DOOR ACCESS CONTROL AND ASSOCIATED CONTROL SYSTEMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 8, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance