USPTO serial 76325559
RHAPSODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHAPSODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing online databases in the field of concerts, videos, television, sports, games, and cultural events; providing online information in the field of concerts, videos, television, sports, games, and cultural events; providing online newsletters in the field of videos, television, sports, games, and cultural events; providing online magazines and books in the field of music, concerts, videos, radio, television, news, sports, games, cultural events, and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |