Drawing for REALVIZ

USPTO serial 76328877

REALVIZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALVIZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040converting data or documents from a physical to an electronic support, namely, CO-ROMs, sound and images magnetic recording supports, sound and images numerical recording supports, video tapes, and audio tapes for othersACTIVE—
041video filmingACTIVE—
042computer programming for others; computer services, namely, providing access time to a central server of databases in the field of computers and computer programming; design of software for others; design of software relating to special effects for others; design of software relating to digital special effects and to the production of computer-aided images for others; software updating; rental of computer software; consultation in computer matters; consultation in software matters; programming computers for others; rental of computers; design of imformatic systems for others; providing access time to a computer for dealing with datas for others; maintenance of software; design, updating and rental of informatic software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 30, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jun 25, 200344DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance