USPTO serial 76338875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Incline Village, NV
Incline Village, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry B. Ward,
HENRY B WARD BANK OF AMERICA101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical interconnects and electrical testing equipment, namely, test sockets and receptacles and testing fixtures, and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Commercial information and directory agency; providing a website to others to promote their goods and services and for posting and matching the equipment and part requirements of buyers and offerings of sellers in the electrical interconnect and testing industries; retail and wholesale store services featuring electrical interconnects and electrical testing equipment and parts therefor; electronic catalog services featuring electrical interconnects and electrical testing equipment and parts therefor; mail order catalog services featuring electrical interconnects and electrical testing equipment and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online communications, namely, real-time transmission of messages among buyers and sellers of various goods, e-mail transmission of messages among buyers and sellers of various goods and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among buyers and sellers of various goods and services, all within the electrical interconnect and testing industries | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |