USPTO serial 76342169
SEIZE SUR VINGT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEIZE SUR VINGT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Powley
ROBERT L POWLEY ESQ LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT L. POWLEY, PC417 CANAL ST 4TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |