USPTO serial 76344622
BIOSORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOSORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Rosenthal
ROBERT E ROSENTHAL PLEVY, HOWARD & DARCY PCPO BOX 226FORT WASHINGTON, PA 19034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AUTOMATED EQUIPMENT COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF DEVICES, NAMELY MAIL HANDLING MACHINERY, MAIL SORTATION MACHINES, MAIL OPENING MACHINES, FOLDING/UNFOLDING DEVICES AND PACKAGE AND MAIL HANDLING AND SORTING DEVICES, BAR CODE LABELING MACHINES, AUTOMATED EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SINGLE MACHINE FOR SORTING, HANDLING AND IMAGING OF MAIL, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSIONS, DOCUMENTS AND PACKAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for controlling equipment for sorting, handling, and imaging of mail, facsimile transmissions, documents and packages; computer hardware and software for converting files between formats, and for receiving, imaging, storing, sorting and classifying of mail, facsimile transmissions, documents, packages, electronic mail, voice calls, recorded voice messages and other electronic messages; data input devices and servers for use in connection with sorting, handling and imaging of mail, facsimile transmissions, documents and packages; optical character recognition devices comprised of scanner, processor and optical character recognition software; printers, fax machines, scanners, computer workstations comprised of central processing units, monitor, keyboard, mouse, scanners, processors, bar code readers and bar code labelers; local area networks, wide area networks, computer monitors and touch screens for use in sorting, handling and imaging of mail, facsimile transmissions, documents and packages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |