USPTO serial 76351449
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MERINDA K CONDRA
MERINDA K CONDRA CONDRA & CONDRA1116 B BROADWAYLUBBOCK, TX 79401UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath, body and hygienic personal care primarily for children, namely astringents for cosmetic purposes, namely, astringents for the face and skin, bar soap; bath oil; bath gel; bath powder; body oil; body scrub; bubble bath; cologne; cream for the body; face and hands; deodorant for personal use; essential oils for personal use; face scrub; fragrant body splash; fragrant body mist; hair cleaning preparations; hair conditioner; hair pomade; hair rinses; hair shampoo; hair spray; hair styling gel; hair styling mousse; liquid soap for hands, face and body; lotion for the body, hands and face; moisturizing body spray; solid body moisturizer; non-medicated lip balm; non-medicated herbal preparations for the bath; lip gloss; non-medicated cleanser for the face and body; non-medicated foot spray; perfume; powder for the body, face and feet; pumice stones for personal use; sachets; salt scrubs for the skin; shower gel; skin clarifiers; skin toners; soap for the body, face and hands, and toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |