Drawing for LA LA

USPTO serial 76351449

LA LA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LA LA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MERINDA K CONDRA

MERINDA K CONDRA CONDRA & CONDRA1116 B BROADWAYLUBBOCK, TX 79401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003bath, body and hygienic personal care primarily for children, namely astringents for cosmetic purposes, namely, astringents for the face and skin, bar soap; bath oil; bath gel; bath powder; body oil; body scrub; bubble bath; cologne; cream for the body; face and hands; deodorant for personal use; essential oils for personal use; face scrub; fragrant body splash; fragrant body mist; hair cleaning preparations; hair conditioner; hair pomade; hair rinses; hair shampoo; hair spray; hair styling gel; hair styling mousse; liquid soap for hands, face and body; lotion for the body, hands and face; moisturizing body spray; solid body moisturizer; non-medicated lip balm; non-medicated herbal preparations for the bath; lip gloss; non-medicated cleanser for the face and body; non-medicated foot spray; perfume; powder for the body, face and feet; pumice stones for personal use; sachets; salt scrubs for the skin; shower gel; skin clarifiers; skin toners; soap for the body, face and hands, and toilet waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 7, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance